Home > ATM Concept > Case Studies > Lumbex D.C. Systems
Lumbex D.C. Systems 12-01-04 - 1:14 PM
The following is a case report of a patient
commencing treatment for lower back pain at the Lumbex Spine Clinic in
Fort Worth, Texas on October 11, 2004. This clinic is a dedicated
non-surgical lumbar spine decompression and strengthening facility.
A 68 year old male minister entered the clinic on crutches with
complaint of lower back pain and left anterior thigh pain. He stated
that the pain appeared suddenly with no apparent cause, although he had
a long history of recurrent bouts of lower back pain. Before this latest
episode, he could walk normally without a cane or crutches and could
handle the everyday duties of a minister. The pain was aggravated by
walking but relieved by sitting. He had been treated for the previous
episodes with chiropractic manipulative therapy with typically fast
resolution of symptoms.
Exam showed a six foot two male of 220 lbs. He had a left anterior list.
Minor's sign was present. Valsalva was negative. Kemp's test would
evoke pain at the left L5 facet area. There was abnormal tenderness over
the facet joints of L5-S1 on the left. Dermatomal testing and reflexes
were normal. Lumbar range of motion was painful and restricted in
extension. Initial diagnosis was lumbar facet syndrome. He was placed on
a treatment plan of daily treatment for three weeks and then decreased
frequency until maximum improvement. Initial treatment consisted of
three sets of lumbar extension exercises on the ATM2 upright treatment
table followed by 25 minutes of lumbar decompression therapy and then
four sets of 15 reps on a lumbar-specific exercise machine. After three
treatment sessions the patient was seeing some improvement in low back
symptoms and could stand straighter. He was asked to walk for a gait
examination and exam showed that the left knee would give way without
warning. Further examination showed normal range of motion and
ligamentous integrity of the left knee joint. The left hip joint had
slight decrease of passive external rotation with abnormal tenderness at
end range. Active range of the hip was evaluated on the ATM2 with the
hip rotation unit. Muscular incoordination and weakness was noted on
internal and external rotation.
The treatment plan was altered to include internal and external rotation
strengthening exercises on the ATM2 hip treatment apparatus. The hip
exercise protocol was to have the patient exercise against maximum
concentric resistance until muscle failure in both ranges of motion. The
knee buckling phenomenon improved with the first treatment. On the
fourth visit the patient had given up the crutches in favor of a walking
cane. On the sixth treatment the patient presented with no cane and
normal gait.
The patient received a total of eight treatments of active therapeutic
movements to the left hip and twenty four treatments of lumbar
decompression, stabilization, and neuromuscular reeducation. He was
dismissed with full recovery from signs and symptoms.
This case points out the need to address the contributing and
perpetuating factors of low back pain. One can only speculate how the
low back condition would have responded without the hip treatment
intervention. What is certain, however is that the clinician has a
responsibility to identify and treat contributing and perpetuating
factors to the chief complaint, wherever they may be.